January 2008

Santa Cruz, California, Surf City trademark feud to end.

 

It appears the spat between the Santa Cruz business of Noland’s on the Santa Cruz wharf is finally going to chill out. What has turned into a testosterone match with Huntington Beach will finally simmer. What has been at the center of the dispute is the first to register and claim the name� Surf City� officially as a trademark. Much like Mc Donald’s, and others who have registered their names, the southern California group was first to do so,so there is a right of precedence in that realm. The facts though of the name give a strong case to Santa Cruz.

Surf City has been a name for Santa Cruz for generations with numerous iterations in the Santa Cruz Sentinel. The name Surf City has been noted as far back as the turn of the century in reference to Santa Cruz in a variety of endeavors. While Santa Cruz County is the second oldest county in the state of California, Huntington Beach is a relative newcomer.

The reality is that surfing has been going on far longer here at Santa Cruz, than probably anywhere else in the continental United States. The history of surfing has many interesting chapters, but I think all agree without the Hawaiian’s coming to Santa Cruz in the late 1800’s the modern water sport would be far different. The surfingforlife.com web site has a great history that is worth checking out.

Surely Jack O’Neill has made it far more comfortable for all with the neoprene wetsuit. That invention single handedly opened the world of surfing to the masses who would not otherwise brave the cold waters of the world. Certainly Santa Cruz would have always been on the map due to its great variety of waves, and quality spots to surf. While the river mouth on the San Lorenzo is not usually a good surf spot unless the storms are active and there is a good flow, it was the choice spot for surfing for the early Hawaiians.

What would just pass for just another surfer pissing match, unfortunately had to go the legal route. Thankfully for Nolan, there was an attorney that fought the case pro bono; otherwise it would be a costly endeavor just to sell a few T-shirts to the tourists. Glad to see that there was an outcome that allowed both cities to be able to cater to the tourists as that is an important industry for both.

Tourism is an important part of many communities’ revenue. Many want to take a memento home as evidence of being there. T’s shirts seem to proclaim to the world� I’ve been there� and are good for starting conversations. As I have traveled I have found many know of our small little slice of heaven. The natural beauty of the area is broad. I think it will be humorously tongue in cheek when our federal government gets off their stupid high horse regarding hemp and marijuana, and the T-shirts are made of natural locally grown hemp fiber. I am sure there would be a lot of support for it.

While surfing has become more of a mainstream sport, many people of all economic strata engage in it. The lawyer was a surfer and took the case pro-bono.I doubt that if he had not been a surfer, he would have given the issue more than a passing thought.

The houses in Santa Cruz nearest the good surf spots have been increasingly updated to nice homes, from small cottages. This appeal of the water has brought a more affluent clientele to the area, which is good for the city coffers and increases the quality of homes. If you want to see some homes in Santa Cruz, follow the link.